WebAbstract: Since the pre-requisites for common-purpose liability where there was no prior agreement were laid down in S V Mgedezi 1989 (1) SA 687 (A), the appellate division … Webjudgments of Botha JA in S v Safatsa and Others 1988 (1) SA 868 (AD) and S v Mgedezi and Others 1989 (1) SA 687 (AD). To avoid repetition and for the sake of convenience I …
NUMSA vs Marley Pipes Systems: The ConCourt judgment
http://www.saflii.org.za/za/cases/ZAKZPHC/2016/9.pdf WebVerhoorhof bevind is nie. Sien S v Mgedezi and Others 1989(1) SA 687(A) op 705 I - 706 C en S v Motaung and Others 1990(4) SA 485(A) op 521 B-D. Op dieselfde grondslag kan beskuldigde 2 homself gelukkig ag dat hy nie ook skuldig bevind is aan poging tot moord op Bedeker nie. Hierdie Hof moet gevolglik opnuut besluit oor 'n gepaste though in a sentence examples
Table of Cases - Juta
Web2014 (2) SACR p Navsa JA and Ponnan JA (Leach JA, Petse JA and Swain AJA concurring) murder; two counts of robbery with aggravating circumstances; assault A with intent to do grievous bodily harm; four counts of possession of firearms in contravention of s 3 read with ss 1, 103, 117, 120 (1) (a) and sch 4 of the Firearms Control Act 60 of ... WebIn discussing the law relating to the common purpose doctrine, Alkema J, sets out the leading cases of S v Safatsa (1988 (1) SA 868 (A) par 57‒63), S v Mgedezi (supra par 64‒72) and S v Thebus (supra par 49 and 73‒74), in which active association common purpose, which was in issue in each of these cases, was refined and authoritatively … http://www.saflii.org.za/za/cases/ZASCA/2024/174.pdf underground92 iced tee