2 d

address-of-packed-member?

address-of-packed-member?

Web-Wno-address-of-packed-member. Do not warn when the address of packed member of struct or union is taken, which usually results in an unaligned pointer value. This is … WebJan 4, 2024 · When compiling with -Werror=address-of-packed-member taking the address of an unaligned element in a packed struct is an error, as it should. Nevertheless, there may be cases where you know it is safe to take such unaligned pointer and want to allow it … classification of natural resources class 9 WebSep 8, 2024 · So, should it be a bug or risk that need to be fixed? if not, should we add this no-address-of-packed-member to CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS? Some background, I run this … early release for state prisoners 2022 south africa WebMay 1, 2024 · El Sun, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:59:52PM +0900 Masahiro Yamada ha dit: > 2024-04-22 6:39 GMT+09:00 Matthias Kaehlcke : > > clang generates plenty of these warnings in different parts of the code, > > to an extent that the warnings are little more than noise. Disable the. WebMay 24, 2016 · Taking the address of a packed member is dangerous since the reduced alignment of the pointee is lost. This can lead to memory alignment faults in some … classification of neck of talus fracture WebJun 17, 2013 · When compiling under VS2010 SP1 targeting 64 bit, calling FuncB with a member of a packed struct generates the following warning: warning C4366: The result of the unary '&' operator may be unaligned. Whereas calling FuncA does not. I would have thought that both cases would have compiled down to pretty much the same code.

Post Opinion